Empirical 30-day Data Proving Targeting on a Daily Basis
This data represents only those targeting events which are entirely unambiguous and empirically quantifiable. What you see here is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of daily targeting events.
This won’t be an article explaining how targeting works or why it is happening; it will simply provide objective, empirical 30-day data on artificially-induced head clicks, ear pressure pops, mini-shocks or “pricks” to the extremities or other areas of the body, artificial tinnitus, and directed energy attacks (pulsed directed energy in the microwave range) which made me sick to the point where I had dry heaving. These phenomena are by no means the only targeting events happening on a daily basis that can be discernibly identified, but they represent the most unequivocal and undeniable evidence of the operation of remote neurological weapons on my brain and nervous system.
The data has been gathered extremely conservatively. First, the standards for data entry (explained below) strictly limit what targeting events can be recorded. These thresholds are specifically designed to rule out any possibility of plausible deniability. None of the recorded events could have happened due to any natural phenomena—each and every event is thereby proven to have originated from an artificial and external stimulus. Second, the standards for data gathering left no room for an event to have been mistakenly recorded. If I am counting the number of head clicks that occurred while I was away from a means of recording the tally, I will always resort to the absolute minimum addition to the tally. For example, if there might have been three head clicks while I was walking around, but I became preoccupied with some distraction and forgot my count, I will only record one head click if that’s where I lost count. So, these numbers are to be taken as low estimates, not only because of the exceedingly high standards for data number entry that exclude many perfectly valid targeting events on the basis of principle, but also because any records lost due to human error or preoccupation with other concerns will not be considered. From this data, it is self-evident that I am being targeting by remote neuroweapons every day.
Universally comprehendible standards
Below is the criteria which establishes this data as unambiguously indicating the presence of artificial & external apparatuses affecting the brain and nervous system:
Head clicks are recorded when they surpass a threshold where my skull is physically reverberating in addition to producing a crackling/snapping noise inside my cranial area. This noise can be described like the crackling of an electrical fence. It is distinctive and unambiguous—meaning nothing natural could have caused it, there is not one in a billion probability of that being the case. Similar to a miniature-sized cattle prod-like zap, a head click amounts to a human rights crime clearly violating the sanctity of my skull. (Note: I may add details on the severity of head clicks experienced, such as when they cause significant physical discomfort.)
Ear pressure pops, the phenomenon of ear pressure loudly popping in my ear as if I was ascending or descending in an airplane, must surpass a threshold where they can be unambiguously defined as not having any probability of a natural cause. The standards for this mainly have to do with situational context. For example, even if I have clearly experienced an ear pressure pop where there was not anywhere near enough water in my ears (if any still) to cause this very loud and distinctive airplane ride-like air pressure pop, simply because of the fact that I was just swimming and submerged underwater, I will not record this targeting event. I will also avoid ear pops that occur when I have significant nasal congestion in order to prevent any occasion for plausible deniability to be used as an explanation. In addition to a complete lack of natural circumstances that could have caused them, ear pops can also be known to be unambiguously artificial because they assail me with an unnatural intensity in volume, never happened whatsoever on a nearly daily basis before started occurring abruptly (this can happen around 5 times a day now, though incidents are down likely because I am recording data on them), and because their statistically significant timing makes it obvious that they are employed as feedback mechanisms to harass me in precisely-timed response to my thoughts.
Directed energy weapon attack symptoms are not limited to getting sick to the point where you start dry heaving on a perfectly good stomach, but dry heaving does provide a simple and objective criteria for data collection. Perhaps from an outside perspective there is more of an element of plausible deniability, but a person who knows their body and who is otherwise healthy can easily discern when they are being hit with a DEW that causes them to have nausea. When it gets to the point where it quickly escalates to dry heaving, this marks an unprecedented medical event. If you get sick with food poisoning of the flu, you are feeling nausea for a long time before the point where you start feeling the urge to vomit. Such a situation does not escalate to vomiting in the matter of a few minutes or even under a minute. The DEW attack apparatus (almost) always stops the attack short of causing you to actually throw up, possibly in order to avoid leaving any physical trace of the attack that could be turned into photographic evidence. The degree of obviousness in these attacks increases when you are looking at something online which the program does not approve of (or writing an article on targeting evidence such as this one), and you start suddenly feeling very sick, whereas you had been feeling very good prior to this sudden episode. There is an obvious statistical significance in the fact that such war crimes almost always happen while the victim is exercising First Amendment rights. This is especially the case as these events pan out over time, increasing the statistical significance to virtual proof in of itself. Though assigning statistical probability to uncanny “coincidental” events would be very difficult to establish criteria for quantifying, the observation of repeated “coincidence” helps qualify the quantifiable criteria of dry heaving with nausea. In each event, the nausea is not linked to any present natural medical condition, such as food poisoning, flu, or physical concussion. The episode of nausea also starts escalating with a rapidly increasing sense of loss of well-being in the brain due to it being a microwave attack (pulsed frequency in the microwave range). As mentioned, these events as described are unprecedented in my medical history.
Artificial tinnitus is an unmistakable ringing sound in the ear akin to the sound effects in movies where a bomb explodes and there is a high pitched sound that serves to convey the sensory experience of characters in the movie. Recorded artificial tinnitus events will not be for just any kind of ringing in the ears—they will always be a sudden and extremely loud and extremely high-pitched ringing in one ear. Both the suddenness and the extreme intensity will distinguish these events as having absolutely no potential natural cause. There are many artificial tinnitus events which occurred during the data collection time period which were not recorded because they were not over-the-top explicitly distinctive enough in volume, or because they lasted one or 2 seconds.
Miniature shocks/pricks to extremities or other body parts have zero precedent as a medical occurrence in my life. Yet, as the data shows, they are now occuring often dozens of times per day. The sensation they cause is akin to a pine needle being used to prick me. These operate in a similar way to the other feedback mechanisms, and like head clicks, clearly have zero potential (0.00%) of a natural cause of any kind. They cannot be explained away as a “pins and needles” phenomenon, which always consists of a sustained period, is a much duller and far less precise or localized sensation, and is related to a circulation problem that would ease up after a sustained period of time in which it occurred. These “pricks” and mini-shocks never can be traced to the denial of blood circulation to a specific area of the body. Though shocks most often occur in extremities like the hands and toes (possibly for purposes of plausible deniability), they also occur in all areas of my body, including the torso, and all areas of the legs and arms. That they occur pretty much anywhere invalidates any presumptions of plausible deniability. Nor is it natural to feel an isolated prick on your body that is localized to a single nerve with extreme precision, especially when it is also precisely timed to deliver a message that has become standard of this program (a regularly repeated patten of feedback mechanisms). These shocks are simply way too strong and localized, it seems to almost a specific nerve (as if that area were pierced by a needle), to be any natural phenomenon of any kind.
Empirical 30-day targeting event data
Please note: figures are about 20-30% lower than actual event incidences because of recording methodology; also, because the program knows I am recording this tally, head clicks (and probably DEW attacks) went significantly down on-average, while targeting events like mini-shock “pricks”, which may be perceived as less inhumane, seemed to grow more frequent to compensate for this change.
Data entry notes:
9/25/2024
Head clicks: #7 was likely the most forceful and painful head click I have ever experienced. It happened while I was pointing out the head clicks are like the snapping noise of an electric fence. It was one of those head clicks which actually starts to become like a real physical attack on the brain and I tasted a slight metallic taste in my mouth afterward from the impact it generated. This head click #7 was physically painful in addition to be psychologically unpleasant.
Ear pressure pops: Both #1 and #2 occurred while I was entirely without nasal congestion, as I took a decongestant and anti-histamine over the counter drug; the second ear pressure pop was markedly loud with a clarity of sound above that which you get in an airplane due to elevation changes, and only occurred in my right ear. This ear pop was to inform me to stop reading an e-book (censorship).
9/26/2024
Head clicks: #5 was especially vicious and caused heightened discomfort, occurring right after I was working on an article explaining nanotechnology for the brain-computer interface (BCI)—it happened at the exact second after I concluded a thought about a good addition for linking up the content to prove links between a criminal case and nanotech for the BCI.
Ear pressure pops: #1 occurred in the left ear, while there was zero nasal congestion. I had taken an extremely effective decongestant/anti-histamine, and my nostrils are completely, absolutely free of any congestion (i.e. there is no natural explanation for this whatsoever).
DEW attacks making me sick with dry heaving: #1 also occurred right after working on an article explaining nanotechnology for the brain-computer interface (see above head click notes from this date). This attack escalated from nausea to dry heaving in less than one minute.
9/27/2024
Head clicks: #1 happened in the middle of a conversation, disrupting ability to interact; #4 happened when I thought, “I’m not getting enough head clicks, I must not be doing enough for the truth”; head clicks have obviously dropped off dramatically since I started recording this tally (I remember thinking on the first day I started recording this tally that the day prior there were at least 15-20 head clicks conservatively).
10/2/2024
Head clicks: #7 was literally attacking me for doing my job—as in for doing something I needed to do; #8 was for eating lunch (overly indulgent?), also a necessary activity.
Ear pressure pops: #3 happened while looking at an article (censorship).
10/3/2024
Head clicks: #5 occurred while thinking about commenting on a post (censorship).
Ear pressure pops: #1 happened while I was writing article on Dr. Lieber and nanotech findings.
Mini-shocks/body “pricks”: #1 was mid-shin, a place where pricks and shocks do not naturally occur at all (this happens in such unnatural places on the body nearly daily).
10/4/2024
DEW attacks making me sick with dry heaving: Over the past 3 days of working on my article, I have been made sick with DEW attacks for sustained periods of time, usually about 15-30 minutes, at least once per day; today was the first time that an attack reached the threshold of making me dry heave.
10/6/2024
Head clicks: After click #4, for example, I ignored 2 clear head clicks which were just very, very light, though they were still obviously discernible as unnatural in origin. Since I began recording a tally, head clicks have gone down in strength and viciousness by more than half their former intensity. It seems they are trying to make it difficult for me to record all these war crimes, because head clicks are not normally this light, and most of them are felt venomously, causing a notable, though very brief, amount of cranial discomfort. Also the head clicks are often attempted to be camouflaged in moments like a sigh or turn of the head, or at other times like when I am getting up to do something—these moments are exploited to deliver these attacks and disrupt the gathering of evidence. Head clicks often exploited such moments to attempt to disguise themselves before, but this phenomenon is more frequent now that I am recording this tally.
10/7/2024
Head clicks: #3 occurred when I heard a threat through V2K as I was trying to obtain a package I ordered with supplements that assist in detoxification from artificial particulate contamination.
Ear pressure pops: #1 demonstrates how clearly unnatural these events are, having occurred when there was no water in my ear nor any congestion in my nose, and while I am at sea level all day long; there is absolutely zero (0%) probability of any natural causation for this event.
Artificial tinnitus: #1 occurred in the left ear for 5-10 seconds.
10/9/2024
Mini-shocks/body ”pricks”: #9 may have been the highest intensity prick-like mini-shock I have experienced, causing me to call out due to shock.
10/15/2024
Head clicks: #3 occurred as I was thinking about how whistleblower research could be perceived as “provocative”; #8 occurred when I heard distinctly external V2K, and was used to emphasize threats which I will not go into the details of here, except to note that the coincidental timing was precise.
10/16/2024
Head clicks: #5 occurred when I said to myself in my head “come on, Google” because I am observing how I receive obvious spam messages that I know they are able to filter, while every email from ICATOR I receive is marked read before I open it; #9 clearly happened right after I said “they are always doing stuff to me”.
10/18/2024
Head clicks: #1 occurred at 12:20 am when I said “I am concerned for my life” [out loud], and at that exact moment they head clicked me; head click #2 also occurred a little later, while I was talking about my concerns on a personal safety level.
Mini-shocks/body ”pricks”: #1 was a finger shock that occurred while I was thinking about how I started to feel a slight pressure on my heart after I wrote the above note about head clicks #9 and #10 that occurred this evening.
DEW attacks making me sick with dry heaving:
The above targets events are violations of the US Constitution, Nuremberg Treaty, Article 32 of the Geneva Conventions, and UDHR. For more information on targeting events in my life, find an archived copy of journal entry evidence here: http://archive.today/2024.10.04-221654/https://patrickkim.substack.com/p/personal-evidence
Conclusion
The standards for this data collection were designed such that no element of plausible deniability can be supposed as an explanation for any of the targeting events recorded. This obviously leaves out a lot of targeting events that are more difficult to quantify or definitively prove in a universally accepted way, especially because significant efforts have been made to intentionally misinform the public on the subject of targeting.
For example, I have left out V2K (Voice-to-Skull technology) events which I am able to discern as coming from an external source because these events are much more difficult to categorically quantify with methods that can universally be accepted as demonstrating an unequivocal artificial origin. However, the fact that I’ve discovered people stalking my brain data through a technology Edward Snowden agrees is called Remote Neural Monitoring (RNM) proves that V2K weapons are trained on me all day, as RNM and V2K are actually the same technology—and even come from the same US patent (US3951134A):
Thank You Gangstalkers: Every Time You Use RNM to Stalk Me, You're Proving Victims of Voice-to-Skull Right
Remote Neural Monitoring and Voice-to-Skull (the ability to put voices in people’s heads) are the same technology. That means each and every time someone uses RNM to stalk someone’s brain data, they are actually proving that weapons of mind manipulation are trained on that person’s brain.
The charts are brilliant!
your records appear to be the result of a very diligent and persistent effort to record events. Do you record sleep disturbance events? Not as a category, but those events that occur when you're sleeping. How long have you been overtly targeted, how did you find out?